Cambodia Archives - Responsible Finance Forum

Situating microinsurance in social protection

28 Oct 2015

This paper discusses the role of microinsurance, in a broader social protection framework, as a possible instrument to mitigate risk and reduce vulnerability of poor and low-income households. The research studies microinsurance as an integral part of social protection systems in six countries: Bangladesh, India, Vietnam, Brazil, Cambodia, and Rwanda. It synthesizes the key messages of the country studies for better integration of microinsurance into social protection while considering the social protection principles of universality, solidarity, and equity. It further focuses on insurable risks suitable for microinsurance, such as sickness, old age, death, accidents and disabilities, and extreme weather events. The paper covers the following sections in detail:

Concept of social protection and microinsurance with a focus on its relevance to the informal economy;
Description and analysis of different social protection systems and microinsurance practices in six countries;
Lessons learned from integrating microinsurance into social protection systems;
Recommendations for extending coverage to the informal economy and other vulnerable groups, improving benefits, and increasing access to public social protection and microinsurance with a focus on approaches that can be replicated in other countries if adapted to fit a specific environment.

2nd European Microfinance Award Social Responsibility in Microfinance

13 May 2015

Since its creation, the European Microfinance Platform has been actively involved in promoting social performance and social responsibility in microfinance.

What is meant by social responsibility is that MFIs are concerned with ensuring that their actions are at least transparent (notion of accountability), that they contribute to developing the financial services on offer and that they have no negative effects on stakeholders (decent work of employees, protection of consumers, protection of the environment, etc.). The notion of social performance encompasses the notion of social responsibility, but the meaning is slightly wider as it also takes into account MFIs’ actions to fulfil a “social and economic mission” in favour of their clients. The concept of social performance is specific to microfinance, it is defined as the effective translation of an MFI’s social mission into practice. This mission is based on four major objectives: serving an increasing number of poor and excluded persons, improving the quality and adaptability of financial services, creating economic and social benefits for clients and improving the social responsibility of an MFI.

In November 2007, during the European Microfinance Week, the issue of ethics and social responsibility in microfinance was identified by the European Microfinance Platform (e-MFP) members as a major issue for the microfinance sector to face within the current challenges of the sector (growth, commercialization, risks of over indebtedness, fight against poverty and vulnerability of clients, etc.). The e-MFP Social Performance Working Group focused in 2008 on the role of the investors in promoting social performance (see European Dialogue N° 1) In this publication, cases of some investors who participated in the e-MFP Social Performance Working Group or at the exchanges organized by the Swiss Development Cooperation in Bern are presented. The case studies of the European Dialogue No.1 provide a rich overview on what social investors actually do to make sure they invest in a socially correct way.

Study on the Drivers of Over-Indebtedness of Microfinance Borrowers in Cambodia

03 Jun 2014

Microfinance has grown rapidly over the last decade, directly reaching millions of poor people worldwide, providing credit and other forms of financial services. If used judiciously, it can serve as an effective instrument in promoting financial inclusion. It is mainly for this reason that BlueOrchard Finance, Incofin and Oikocredit have been investing significant amounts of capital and other resources in MFIs around the world.

The microfinance sector in Cambodia has grown rapidly over the last ten years. It has successfully professionalized as one of the leading microfinance sectors in the Southeast Asian region. There are claims, however, that the sector might be nearing saturation. Concerns have been raised that the possibility of over-indebtedness among borrowers could undermine the social mission and the sustained healthy development of the sector.

In some countries where microfinance services have rapidly expanded, the problem has shifted from the poor having too little access to finance, to having too much access, with the option of even borrowing from several MFIs. Aggressive growth of microfinance, even if driven by the desire to reach out to those with limited access to capital, could have a negative impact when borrowers take too much debt.

Over-indebtedness has become among the most serious risks of microfinance today and impacts all stakeholders. Most importantly, borrowers who are unable to repay their loans risk losing their assets, even their livelihoods, potentially worsening their living conditions. Where client protection and safety nets are weak, microfinance borrowers are often left with no financial or social support once they become over-indebted. The potential economic, psychological and sociological consequences are far reaching. Significant loan defaults can also gravely affect the portfolio quality of MFIs, putting institutional stability and sustainability at serious risk as has been seen in various countries around the world. This in turn can hurt returns for investors in the sector, tarnish the overall image of the industry, and potentially jeopardize the excellent work that so many are doing to build a healthy and sustainable inclusive financial system.

While over-indebtedness is a pressing and urgent challenge for the microfinance sector, the truth is that we know little about it and no industry level publication on multiple borrowing and OID in Cambodia exists. This is the reason that we embarked on this study, the aim of which is to contribute to a better understanding of the drivers of over-indebtedness among borrowers in selected saturated areas in Cambodia. As such, the study is limited to selected areas in the country. It will not be able to answer all our questions but we feel that it offers important insights from the borrowers and the factors that drove them to over-indebtedness. These should serve as key elements of our understanding of over-indebtedness.

Oikocredit, Incofin and BlueOrchard Finance strive to finance MFIs that hold to their mission of providing access to finance for those excluded from the formal financial system. We are cognizant that the challenge for Cambodian MFIs has shifted from financial sustainability to responsibility in ethical lending. Anchored by our commitment to the fair treatment and protection of microfinance clients, we invest in MFIs that offer services to disadvantaged people in a responsible, transparent and sustainable manner. As social investors, we want to ensure that as the microfinance sector grows, so does steadfast adherence to strict standards in responsible lending. We hope that this study will provide valuable inputs to improve collective efforts among stakeholders of the microfinance sector to prevent over-indebtedness and to ensure further protection of borrowers in Cambodia. We also hope that this study and its methodological framework could be used in other countries in order to better understand the drivers of multiple borrowing and over-indebtedness more broadly, to prevent their development and ensure the preservation of a sound and responsible microfinance industry.